News Release

Contact

Tabitha Woodruff,
Ohio PIRG

Michigan Beats Ohio in a Landslide in Government Spending Transparency

Ohio’s “D+” in Annual Report Overshadowed by Michigan’s “A-”
For Immediate Release

Columbus, March 26 – “It’s bad enough that Michigan momentarily slid ahead of Ohio State in the AP Poll and B1G standings last month,” said Tabitha Woodruff, Advocate with the Ohio PIRG Education Fund, “Letting them lap us in the rankings for government spending transparency is just disappointing.”

Ohio received a “D+” when it comes to government spending transparency, according to “Following the Money 2013: How the States Rank on Providing Online Access to Government Spending Data,” the fourth annual report of its kind by the Ohio PIRG Education Fund.  Michigan received an “A-” and is highlighted as a “Leading State” by the report.

“State governments across the country have become more transparent about where public money goes, providing citizens with the information they need to hold elected officials and businesses that receive public funds accountable,” said Woodruff. “But Ohio still has a long way to go.”

Officials from Ohio and 47 other states provided the researchers with feedback on their initial evaluation of state transparency websites. The leading states with the most comprehensive transparency websites are Texas, Massachusetts, Florida, Illinois, Kentucky, Michigan, and Oklahoma.

Based on an inventory of the content and ease-of-use of states' transparency websites, “Following the Money 2013” assigns each state a grade of “A” to “F.” The report describes Ohio as a “lagging state” in online spending transparency. The state’s transparency website provides checkbook-level information on contracts, economic development tax credits, and grants. However, it lacks other kinds of detailed information, such as on non-contract payments to vendors or spending through off-budget agencies. Also, the website does not provide adequate information to hold companies accountable for economic development subsidies.

Ohio’s grade is an improvement from the “D” it received in last year’s report.

Since last year’s “Following the Money” report, there has been remarkable progress across the country with new states providing online access to government spending information and several states pioneering new tools to further expand citizens’ access to this data. 

One of the most striking findings in this year’s report is that all 50 states now provide at least some checkbook-level detail about individual government expenditures. In 48 states—all except California and Vermont—this information is now searchable. Just three years ago, only 32 states provided checkbook-level information on state spending online, and only 29 states provided that information in searchable form. Thirty-nine state transparency websites now include tax expenditure reports, providing information on government expenditures through tax code deductions, exemptions and credits—up from just eight states three years ago.

“Open information about the public purse is crucial for democratic and effective government,” said Woodruff. “It is not possible to ensure that government spending decisions are fair and efficient unless information is publicly accessible.”

The states with the most transparent spending stand out partly because they are comprehensive about the kinds of spending they include, such as data on economic development subsidies, expenditures granted through the tax code, and quasi-public agencies. At least six states have launched brand new transparency websites since last year’s report, and most made improvements that are documented in the report. The best state transparency tools are highly searchable, engage citizens, and include detailed information—allowing all the information to be put to good use.

States that have created or improved their online transparency have typically done so with little upfront cost. In fact, top-flight transparency websites can save money for taxpayers, while also restoring public confidence in government and preventing misspending and pay-to-play contracts.

“The state of Ohio should continually improve the breadth and ease-of-access of online government spending information,” said Woodruff. “Given our state budget problems, Ohioans need to be able to follow the money.” 

To access the state’s transparency website, click here.

To read the report, click here.

Support Us

Your tax-deductible donation supports Ohio PIRG Education Fund's work to educate consumers on the issues that matter, and to stand up to the powerful interests that are blocking progress.

Learn More

You can also support Ohio PIRG Education Fund’s work through bequests, contributions from life insurance or retirement plans, securities contributions and vehicle donations.